-
Recent Posts
Archives
- August 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- October 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- January 2022
- July 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- February 2020
- October 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- February 2019
- December 2018
- November 2017
- July 2017
- November 2016
- October 2016
- June 2016
- February 2016
- October 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
- August 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
I think of research supervision as….
- advancing your research supervision practice
- Analytical tools for the early months of candidature
- research supervision as advancing knowledge
- research supervision as management
- research supervision as pedagogy
- research supervision as relationship
- research supervision provisioning a creative environment
- research supervision supporting a research culture
- The conversations with research students
- Uncategorized
Meta
Monthly Archives: December 2022
A sense of goodness: making the quality discourse explicit.
Geof Hill – the Investigative Practitioner One of the challenges in working with doctoral candidates is helping them to understand implicit quality criteria for various issues or practices they are investigating, while at the same time alerting them to the … Continue reading