-
Recent Posts
Archives
- August 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- October 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- January 2022
- July 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- February 2020
- October 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- February 2019
- December 2018
- November 2017
- July 2017
- November 2016
- October 2016
- June 2016
- February 2016
- October 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
- August 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
I think of research supervision as….
- advancing your research supervision practice
- Analytical tools for the early months of candidature
- research supervision as advancing knowledge
- research supervision as management
- research supervision as pedagogy
- research supervision as relationship
- research supervision provisioning a creative environment
- research supervision supporting a research culture
- The conversations with research students
- Uncategorized
Meta
Monthly Archives: May 2023
Developing a doctoral candidate’s academic voice.
Geof Hill – The Investigative Practitioner What does it mean for an academic to have a ‘voice’? The idea of ‘voice’ is more than an ability to speak. When used in an academic sense, it suggests substance of the content. … Continue reading